ask a priestTheology

Ask a Question

My questions

My following questions

Browse by topic

Search

 

0 +

 

Pagan Blood in Christ's Lineage

A Xt3 Member asked at 12:51am on September 11th 2017
I'm just curious about what the pope said that Christ had pagan blood running through his veins. (This is the proper translation. I've run it a few times and double checked it with Catholic sites that posted his full Homily in english)



What does he mean that Christ has Pagan blood running through his veins? The only thing I can find in his lineage would be Ruth who was born a Moabite but became a convert to Judaism. Is that what he means by Pagan blood in Christ's veins?



Cause It just doesn't sound right.

0 +

 
Hi Dee, Pope Benedict in his wonderful little book, The Infancy Narratives, notes that in the genealogy in St Matthew's Gospel, before Mary is mentioned at the end, 'four women are mentioned by name: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and the wife of Uriah... none of these women were Jewish [though as you say, Ruth converted to Judaism]. So through them the world of the Gentiles enters the genealogy of Jesus - his mission to Jews and Gentiles is made manifest' (pp. 6 - 7).

But Abraham wasn't Jewish either, since we can say that it's only with him that the Chosen People came into existence. As we see often in the life of Jesus, the pagans, like the Sidonian woman, like the centurions, are often way ahead of their Jewish brothers and sisters in their openness to Jesus -- so that what counted with Jesus, and then, after some hiccups, with St Peter and obviously St Paul, isn't blood but faith. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (35)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

Alternative to Magic Spells Safe for Catholics?

A Xt3 Member asked at 7:36pm on August 4th 2017
Good afternoon, Father Brendan,

I have a question regarding this particular website: http://main.morethanlife.org/logos-home.html

From what I've gathered, it's hosted by a group called More Than Life Ministries, which seems to be a general Christian ministry focused on prayers and prayer requests, with no specific denomination in mind. This half of their website, however, concerning the Logos, is touted as the alternative to a magic spell, and is said to be more effective and far safer. It also says that anybody of any religious background can use it. My question is is it in fact okay for a Catholic such as myself to use such a service? I ask because I would really like to experience some of the luxuries that purportedly come about with the use of the Logos, but I also want to be in good standing with God. And I don't want to end up in a situation like my Dad's, where I am so consumed by my work life that I don't have time for my family or kids. (if I even have one, but that's another question for another time). I would really like to know your thoughts concerning this website, should you take the time to peruse it. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Ryan

0 +

 
Hi Ryan, I checked out that website, and I'd definitely steer clear of it. Whatever its claims to be of Christian inspiration, here's a sample of what it says about More Than Life Ministries:

  • Have a powerful Master of the 'Logos' put his skill and experience to work for you
  • If you are looking for love, wealth, happiness, personal goals, fulfillment, truth, enlightenment... whatever your personal need, you need the power of the 'Logos' at work for you.
  • The 'Logos' was the creative word spoken at the beginning of time now our Masters of the 'Logos' will direct that creative word in your direction.
  • Passed down from generation to generation since the beginning of time the secret of the 'Logos' has been entrusted to wise men who have used its authority to speak into being the wants, wishes and desires of those who truly believe and give themselves to its mystical power.
  • Now we have joined with international Master of the 'Logos' Chakar Santil to bring the power of the Universal Word to those who are in need...

All this is so vague, with no mention of the Church, nor even of the Chosen People of the Old Testament, just these mysterious Masters of the Logos (rather scarily depicted on the website, in black, wearing what looks like black Ku Klux Klan headgear), led by the mysterious International Master of the Logos, Chakar Santil, and certainly no mention of Jesus Christ. And I find odd its assertion that invoking their logos is nothing like a magic spell, with none of the bad effects gained from contacting (on the basis of the website's illustration) evil spirits: as if the kind of people they expect to recruit are those who have already been trying out magic of some sort. Which makes me feel that the Logos website has its origins in some mixture of Eastern religions.

Nor is it too bothered about its success stories verging on forms of moral behaviour that would certainly go against either Judaism or Christianity: 'I was heartbroken when my lover left me for another woman. I cried all night long and was desperate for him to return. A friend told me about the "Bring My Lover Back" logos. Within days he was back and our relationship has been better than ever. Petra T.'

My advice would be to turn to Christian prayer, to pray through, in and with Jesus to the Father, for whatever you wish. But the basic form of all Christian prayer is Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Olives before he died, 'let not my will, but yours be done.' Along with all the usual prayers we say, especially the Rosary. I don't have time to go into the very obvious appeal for cash donations, the huge importance of 'seeds of faith' - which for all I know are used, as the website says, for feeding the hungry and helping the homeless. But the connection of success in those prayers with cash donations reminded me of some of the much disgraced televangelism rackets. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (118)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

Exorcism

A Xt3 Member asked at 3:15pm on July 24th 2017
How long does an exorcism take place?can it take months?

0 +

 
Hi Celestine, from what I've read about exorcisms, it can sometimes take months, as you say, with multiple exorcisms required to finally rid someone who has been possessed of an evil spirit. Some individual exorcisms I've read about can take several hours.

In over 50 years as a priest I've only encountered one clear case of possession. When I was with this person, their face changed expression, they spoke in some unintelligible language, there was an eerie laugh, and when I tried to pray a simple exorcism prayer over them, they banged their head against the wall very painfully - so much so that I was sure the person hadn't being pretending in any way. An ordinary priest isn't allowed to carry out exorcisms, only one delegated by the bishop. I immediately contacted the authorities in my diocese so I could put this person in touch with the diocesan exorcist. From what I heard, he carried out several exorcisms, and I think the evil spirit, who had been tormenting this devout person, left. Thank God Jesus has given this power of driving out evil spirits to his Church!

Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (91)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

addiction

A Xt3 Member asked at 11:41pm on July 12th 2017
Good morning Father.I really want to know about "addiction diminish culpability".I have readed a lot of information about addiction or vice.For example,if i have a true addiction like watching pornography,does my addiction diminish or mitigate my culpability?but how the addiction can diminish my culpability even though we know that pornography is a grave matter?thanks and God bless.

0 +

 
Hi Christopher, I'm afraid I have to say that I wouldn't approach this issue quite like that. The people I know who have overcome addictions all say the same two things: You have to throw yourself into God's hands, and you have to have zero tolerance - absolutely no half measures.

Let's take alcohol addiction: If, because I'm already an alcoholic, I crash into a pedestrian on a legitimate pedestrian crossing, my guilt isn't less because I'm an alcoholic - it's greater. Firstly, because I'm responsible for 'nursing' my addiction at an earlier stage, and secondly, because of that addiction, I should never have put myself behind the wheel of a car when I was drunk. And no matter what I'm addicted to - drink, drugs, or pornography - the cure is the same: zero tolerance. That involves the pain of going cold turkey, but people who want to reform take that on no matter how painful it is.

How does a Christian face into zero tolerance? By relying completely on God, maybe saying that prayer of Blessed John Henry Newman, "O my Lord Jesus, low as I am in Your all-holy sight, I am strong in You, strong through Your Immaculate Mother, through Your saints and thus I can do much for the Church, for the world, for all I love." Or, with Blessed Chiara Badano, "If you want it, Jesus, I want it too" - that was her prayer in great agony from bone cancer.

If you had a look at St Augustine's Confessions, where he tells the story of his own conversion (including from sexual sins), you'll find out how, thinking of the saints, he could say, if they can do it, why can't I? So, instead of depending on ourselves - who are never strong enough on our own to give up an addiction - we learn to be able not to be able to do anything on our own, but with St Paul, discover that 'I can do all things in him who strengthens me' (Phil 4:13). Very best, and keeping you in my prayers, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (78)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

Can God command us to do evil?

A Xt3 Member asked at 2:18pm on July 1st 2017
Hello Father,

I was looking through a book called "Hard Sayings: A Catholic Approach to Answering Bible Difficulties". I read the book of Joshua in the Bible and there were commands from God to kill women and children of other societies. In the book the author says one way to look at these commands is that because God is the author of all life, he can give and take away life even if they are innocent so perhaps he did this through the Israelites.

In most atheism vs theism debates, Christian debators often talk about God being all-good and how it would be against his nature to request evil acts from us because he is perfect. Moral truths exist because God is perfect goodness itself and so it would be impossible for him to sin or be evil by definition with common examples of moral truths given being killing innocent people, rape etc.

So my question would be, if it is objectively wrong to kill innocent people like children, how should I respond to this idea that God is sending the Israelites to commit an evil act? So, if God is all-good why would he send people to act in a way contrary to his nature?

Thanks for your help.

0 +

 
Hi Miguel,

It's helpful to remember that the Bible isn't just one book, but a whole library of books, where the Old Testament is covering a period of about 1800 years, from Abraham on, through Moses, King David, the Prophets, the later Wisdom writings and so on. The story those various books tell is a gradual unfolding of God's plan for his people, where that unfolding is accompanied by the people of Israel - at least some of them - slowly growing in understanding and appreciation of that plan.

The people were chosen by God, but that choice didn't suddenly change them from being a tribal group with similar customs to the groups around them. Law, punishment for crime, and the rules of war, marriage, religious worship, and so on, took many centuries to move in the direction of the teaching of the great prophets like Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel. It's not until those later writers, say from 700bc on, that you get a clear notion of individual responsibility, of marriage as between one man and one woman, and guilt as not determined by the action of members of the tribe in the past, but only by each one's own wrongdoing.

So I wouldn't be inclined to use the explanation given in Hard Sayings. Rather, just like the patriarchs having several wives, I'd see the rule of war in Joshua as expressing the normal slaughter that goes on among human beings (if you want equivalent slaughter among the 'highly civilized' Athenians slaughter of the inhabitants of the island of Melos (covered by Greek historian Thucydides) in 416bc, you can see how 'normal' that treatment of enemies was. God's patience extended to allowing the Chosen People gradually to see the implications of his covenant with them.

If you'd like modern examples of how slowly human beings respond, even to Christianity, think of William Wilberforce's struggle in then Christian England to have slavery abolished in 1807. And regarding war, St Augustine was the first to develop what's now called 'just war theory' in the 400s - and that was in light of Christ's teaching to love our enemies. He asked how a Christian can engage in war while following Christ's teaching. Summarizing what later was developed by St Thomas Aquinas, and much later, adopted in secular law from Grotius in the 1700s on, they taught in war you should never kill innocents, and only aim at preventing evil rather than at killing enemies. This means that legal agreements like the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war - often ignored even in our own times - come mostly from the New Testament and the teaching of Christ. It takes us human beings a long time to learn! Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (109)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

catechism

A Xt3 Member asked at 3:05pm on May 31st 2017
Hello,

Are all catechisms valid?

For example: https://www.ewtn.com/faith/teachings/goda21a.htm

Thanks

0 +

 
Hi Anna, all officially approved Catechisms are surely valid (which would exclude, for example, the Dutch Catechism of 1966, which had certain areas that were not considered to be in line with the Church's teaching). So the Baltimore Catechism, first published in 1885, is fine. But why not use the Catechism of the Catholic Church first issued in 1992 and easily available online? It's more up to date with all the Church's teaching since 1885, and there are various shorter, summary versions of it too. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (132)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

full knowledge

A Xt3 Member asked at 1:22pm on May 25th 2017
Shalom.i have a question.What does the term "full knowledge" mean? Does full knowledge mean one has to have the most knowledge about sins (like most knowledge of why watching pornography is a sin)?

0 +

 
Hi Christopher, we say that the requirements for our being responsible for any action, means that we must know what we're doing and choose to do it. So 'full knowledge' means just an ordinary awareness of what we're doing, not at all some kind of scientifically validated knowledge. Say I'm a truck driver or airline pilot, whatever, it's not rocket science for me to know that if I've been drinking, I shouldn't get behind the wheel or into the cockpit. Maybe I can take a small beer or single glass of wine (everyone has different capacities), but it's a professional requirement for me to know I can't go even one drop over the minimum allowed by law.

Regarding pornography, a friend of mine gave me the example of a 'cyanide sandwich' -- all you need is a tiny dot of cyanide in an otherwise normal sandwich to kill you . In areas to do with sexuality, the only way to deal with pornography is zero tolerance, never to allow even the slightest image that could be an occasion of sin. Because if the devil spots that I'm lowering my guard (a bit like an opposing team can spot if a guy on the other side is scared of being tackled, they'll fall on him like a ton of bricks), he'll let me compromise a little here and a little there, and like St Peter warns, he's going about like a lion looking for someone to devour. Then he pounces on me because I haven't refused to compromise in the least. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (253)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

filial fear and impassibility of God

A Xt3 Member asked at 12:37am on May 15th 2017
shalom Father.There is something i want to ask you.Just now i copied the meaning of filial fear from internet " when someone is deeply in love with God, loves God so much and has a true relationship with God, they just avoid causing hurt and wounds on anyone else and God".My question is when we do something that might hurt the other,does our sin hurt God too?If we say "God hurts when we sin" that means God also has an emotion like us and God is not impassible.I'm sorry if i ask this question again because i still confuse.thanks and God bless

0 +

 
Hi Christopher, the short answer is that as God, Jesus can't suffer, but as the Incarnate Word he certainly did suffer when he was on earth. He wept over Jerusalem, and surely in Gethsemane and on the Cross, all the evil and sin that was or ever will be committed by us humans caused him great suffering. In the Creeds, when I say that I believe that the One I call 'God from God,' was incarnate of the Virgin Mary and became man (I'm typing this in Rome airport so don't have any backup docs handy, so quote from my totally useless memory), we keep on saying that he suffered under Pontius Pilate--it's the same 'he.' the Second Person of the Trinity, who suffers, dies on the Cross and rises from the dead. So certainly, Jesus, God and Man, suffers. And all those saints who have had special experiences of the Heart of Jesus--including St Margaret Mary Alacoque, and St Faustina, will testify to this suffering of Jesus for our sins. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (164)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

0 +

 

Clarification about the Tabernacle

A Xt3 Member asked at 12:50pm on March 31st 2017
I would like to clarify, when did the present structure of our tabernacle start?

0 +

 
Hi Joseph, you'll really have to do your own research on this, as among the very many things I'm not, is a liturgical historian! In the early Church, the first Christians had to be very careful about keeping the Blessed Sacrament, as the authorities would profane it if they could. Much later in history, I found out something when attending Mass at a Carmelite Church in Paris. The church belonged to the community whose sisters were martyred during the French Revolution. Since the revolutionaries were inclined to profane the Blessed Sacrament (as happened later after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 1917, and in the Spanish Civil War), the tabernacle in that church had two sets of locked doors, as an extra safeguard.

We know from historical details like the story of St Tarcisius, the young acolyte during the persecutions of the Emperor Valerian (who reigned from 253 - 259). He was given the task of bringing the Eucharist to Christian prisoners, who were probably awaiting execution. Some boys noticed he was carrying something, but rather than give up the Eucharist to them, he accepted being severely beaten, till he was rescued by other Christians. But he died soon after, and was buried in the catacombs of St Callistus. Pope Damasus (who died in 384) wrote a poem about 'the boy-martyr of the Eucharist.' From this story, I'm sure there's plenty more evidence, we can see that the Eucharist was reserved outside the celebration of the Mass.

So I imagine that the reserved Eucharistic hosts were always preserved in very secure, safe-like boxes, and that this reservation began in the early years of the Church. Very best, Fr Brendan
 Response     viewed (219)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

1 +

 

Theology of the Tabernacle

A Xt3 Member asked at 2:09pm on March 14th 2017
Hello! I would like to ask how did the tabernacle develop up to the present day?

1 +

 
Hi Joseph, the tabernacle means 'dwelling place,' so when St John (1: 14) says that 'the Word became flesh and dwelt among us,' that word 'dwelt' can also be translated as 'tabernacled among us.'

The Jewish tabernacle was the portable Temple, where the people of Israel worshipped God. God commanded Moses to put some of the manna there: 'And Moses said to Aaron, "take a jar and put an omer of manna in it and place it before the Lord, to be kept throughout your generations"' (see Ex 16: 32-34). This sacred manna was to be reserved in the Holy of Holies of the Temple, not for the people to eat it, but to look upon it: 'so that they may see the bread.'

When Jesus explained the Eucharist in chapter six of St John's Gospel (6: 48-71), he didn't draw on the symbolism of the Paschal Lamb, but of the manna. Brant Pitrie in his marvellous Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist suggests (pp. 94-95) that line in the Our Father where we normally say 'give us this day our daily bread,' means 'give us this day our supersubstantial bread' (Mt 6:11). He suggests that the Greek word epiousios means what today we'd call 'supernatural,' with 'epi' meaning 'above' and 'ousia' meaning 'substance' or 'nature.' So the Our Father is referring to our Eucharistic manna, nourishing the faithful daily with Jesus on their own journey towards their face to face meeting with Him in Paradise.

In the light of the Old and New Testament, I think it's easy to see how, following Christ's own language about the Eucharist as the 'bread of life,' that the Church chose to call the receptacle of the Blessed Sacrament the tabernacle. That's where the Eucharistic Hosts are reserved both for later reception outside the Mass by those who are sick, and to be worshipped by the faithful, far more than the original manna which the Israelites looked upon in the Temple tabernacle. Very best, Fr Brendan
Read more     Response     viewed (409)  ::   ::  followed (0)  ::  Tweet  :: 

More